Constitutional Rights

Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights
Research, review and analyze Korb v. Raytheon, 707 F.Supp. 63 (D.Mass. 1989). Based on your research and the case, write a 5-6 page paper in which you:
1.Analyze and evaluate each case independently by providing the following (about two paragraphs per case):
•Facts of the case
•Issues
•Rule
2.Analyze and explain the challenges with freedom of speech.
3.Analyze and explain any challenges with freedom of information.
4.Analyze and explain any challenges with employment law.
5.Analyze and discuss the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
6.Analyze and discuss any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
7.Provide at least four (4) additional court cases that support your analysis.
The assignment must:
•Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
•Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
•Recommend how the legal system addresses critical issues faced by public officials to include freedom of the press, funding of government contracts, separation of church and state, public ethics law, hiring lawyers, and handling civil litigation.
•Evaluate legal subjects relevant to public administration to include property, government contracts, employment, and torts.
•Relate the administrative process, constitutional and statutory requirements, to the scope of judicial review of administrative agency decisions.
•Assess legal decisions related to the administration of public goods.
•Use technology and information resources to research issues in constitution and administrative law.
•Write clearly and concisely about issues in constitution and administrative law using proper writing mechanics.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric found here.
Points: 370 Assignment 3: Constitutional Rights
Criteria Unacceptable
Below 70% F Fair
70-79% C Proficient
80-89% B Exemplary
90-100% A
1. Analyze and evaluate case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Weight: 12% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule. Partially analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule. Satisfactorily analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule. Thoroughly analyzed and evaluated case 1, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
2. Analyze and evaluate case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
Weight: 12% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule. Partially analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule. Satisfactorily analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule. Thoroughly analyzed and evaluated case 2, including the facts of the case, issues, and rule.
3. Analyze and explain the challenges with freedom of speech.
Weight: 12% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and explained the challenges with freedom of speech. Partially analyzed and explained the challenges with freedom of speech. Satisfactorily analyzed and explained the challenges with freedom of speech. Thoroughly analyzed and explained the challenges with freedom of speech.
4. Analyze and explain any challenges with freedom of information.
Weight: 12% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and explained any challenges with freedom of information. Partially analyzed and explained any challenges with freedom of information. Satisfactorily analyzed and explained any challenges with freedom of information. Thoroughly analyzed and explained any challenges with freedom of information.
5. Analyze and explain any challenges with employment law.
Weight: 12% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and explained any challenges with employment law. Partially analyzed and explained any challenges with employment law. Satisfactorily analyzed and explained any challenges with employment law. Thoroughly analyzed and explained any challenges with employment law.
6. Analyze and discuss the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
Weight: 13% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and discussed the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense. Partially analyzed and discussed the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense. Satisfactorily analyzed and discussed the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense. Thoroughly analyzed and discussed the public perceptions of Raytheon and its influence with the Department of Defense.
7. Analyze and discuss any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
Weight: 12% Did not submit or incompletely analyzed and discussed any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case. Partially analyzed and discussed any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case. Satisfactorily analyzed and discussed any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case. Thoroughly analyzed and discussed any fraud or misrepresentation on either side of the case.
8. Clarity and writing mechanics
Weight: 10% More than 6 errors present 5-6 errors present 3-4 errors present 0-2 errors present
9. Research and cite at least four (4) court cases that support the analysis.
Weight: 5% Researched and cited no court cases that support the analysis. Researched and cited one or two (1 or 2) court cases that support the analysis. Researched and cited three (3) court cases that support the analysis. Researched and cited at least four (4) court cases that support the analysis.

Place Similar Order Now!

  • Our Support Staff are online 24/7
  • Our Writers are available 24/7
  • Most Urgent order is delivered with 6 Hrs
  • 100% Original Assignment Plagiarism report can be sent to you upon request.
[order_calculator]